Still going strong
Kevin on 04/06/2010
Performance: 5
Comfort: 4
Fuel Economy: 4
Fun To Drive: 3
Interior Design: 4
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 5
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 4
Performance Rating: 5
Interior Rating: 4
Reliability Rating: 5
Reliable car, runs well still. How much fun can a minivan be to drive, so I only gave it a 5. The baseline model could of used a few features like heated mirrors, power windows. Otherwise the exterior is a nice look. The stow and go seating would of been a nice touch. However the car is still going strong and I hope to take it over 100k before I begin to think about replacing it.
You get your money's worth.
Mike Pastore on 01/22/2010
Performance: 5
Comfort: 4
Fuel Economy: 3
Fun To Drive: 4
Interior Design: 5
Exterior Design: 4
Build Quality: 4
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 4
Performance Rating: 5
Interior Rating: 5
Reliability Rating: 5
Purchased car new in 2003, and now have 55,000 miles on the odometer. Car still has original brakes, tires and battery. This van has been problem free from day one. Easy to park and drive in the city, and on the highway you can lock the cruise control on 70 MPH, and the van rsponds effortlessly. There is very little wind or engine noise. Get's about 22 MPG on average. It's amazing how much stuff you can haul when you remove the 3rd row seat.
Wow...
Doc on 01/19/2010
Performance: 2
Comfort: 3
Fuel Economy: 3
Fun To Drive: 1
Interior Design: 2
Exterior Design: 3
Build Quality: 2
Reliability: 1
Comfort Rating: 3
Performance Rating: 2
Interior Rating: 2
Reliability Rating: 1
The van had a clean carfax, low miles, and checked out fine at auto shop. However, after 1200 miles from purchase, the transmission went out, had a complete rebuild done on it. now about 1200 miles later she is going into the shop again to get the transmission rebuilt again. Also, the alternator went bad, tie rods went bad, has a new electrical issue, and has just become a pile of junk we get to pay for.
Bad transmission
Read this! on 07/24/2009
Performance: 3
Comfort: 4
Fuel Economy: 3
Fun To Drive: 4
Interior Design: 3
Exterior Design: 3
Build Quality: 1
Reliability: 1
Comfort Rating: 4
Performance Rating: 3
Interior Rating: 3
Reliability Rating: 1
Transmission blew at only 79000 miles. We had xmission serviced at 48000. Engine has ping. Exhaust system has loud rattle they can't fix. Outside trim pealing back. Toher than these, we are satisfied with this vehicle. Oh, did fail to mention, I will never buy from Chrysler again!
Chrysler T&C - Junk
Mark Tribbia on 06/06/2008
Performance: 3
Comfort: 4
Fuel Economy: 3
Fun To Drive: 3
Interior Design: 3
Exterior Design: 2
Build Quality: 1
Reliability: 1
Comfort Rating: 4
Performance Rating: 3
Interior Rating: 3
Reliability Rating: 1
I bought this 2003 van new because I didn't want to spend time getting a used car repaired. This van has been far less dependable than my 1989 Cadillac was. Five years, three transmissions, cabin leaking A/C, front brake repair three times, (locked caliper damage only 3 months after new front brakes installed), gas line issue, broken power window, factory tires were junk, CD broken, suspension repair required. And today, some weird high pitched humming noise. Should have kept the Cadillac.
It carries people, not much else....
Paul on 10/05/2007
Performance: 2
Comfort: 3
Fuel Economy: 3
Fun To Drive: 1
Interior Design: 4
Exterior Design: 3
Build Quality: 2
Reliability: 4
Comfort Rating: 3
Performance Rating: 2
Interior Rating: 4
Reliability Rating: 4
It doesn't take you long to realize this van was designed to do one thing - move people. The seats are not height adjustable. The engine is very underpowered. The gas mileage is average at best-around 22. The only real upside to the vehicle is the reliability. Also, the sound system is pretty good. Only had problems with the taillights falling off. You'd be hard pressed to pass an '82 corolla. You don't make turns so much as you roll around them. Four wheel disk brakes are optional as well as the ABS. It is unsafe, unkempt and poorly engineered; but remember it can carry seven people and has a cup holder for everyone. People wonder why American car companies are going down the tubes.
Very Happy at 38K, except...
e-doc on 02/21/2005
Performance: 4
Comfort: 4
Fuel Economy: 4
Fun To Drive: 4
Interior Design: 4
Exterior Design: 4
Build Quality: 4
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 4
Performance Rating: 4
Interior Rating: 4
Reliability Rating: 5
...a water leak somewhere in the dash. I'm a guy who recently inherited a new family via marriage. Went from a Toyota T-100 to the 2003 Voyager. Got a previously leased one for a song. I use it for multiple purposes...commuting (25 miles each way), travel, hauling. I was surprised! Actually has a sporty feel for a mini-van. Handles pretty well, I guess because of the short wheel base. Decent pick-up for a mini-van. Clean dash layout. Comfortable, too! Heavy seats don't bother me. Great value for the money. I compared it to the Town and Country; the latter was more luxurious but lumbered like a land yacht. Voyager is basic mini-van with value and so far, reliability (except for that leak).
So far so good!
myvoyager on 08/30/2004
Performance: 2
Comfort: 4
Fuel Economy: 4
Fun To Drive: 3
Interior Design: 5
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 5
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 4
Performance Rating: 2
Interior Rating: 5
Reliability Rating: 5
Van has 18000 miles...so far no
problems.....even had major accident
wiping out whole drivers side...wife
walked away from it...11,000 damage.
Overall comfortable , convenient and
with rebated was lowest priced van at
the time of purchase, other than Kia
Sedona. Didnt hear many good things
about KIA. Very happy except when
traveling on hill / mountain areas. 4
banger has no power except when u rev
it to death....but compromise in power
for MPG. Van steadily gets about 22 or
better on road trips...got 27MPG on
trip to Florida.
2003 Chrsler Voyager LX (Used)
Dana Marder on 12/06/2003
Performance: 5
Comfort: 5
Fuel Economy: 5
Fun To Drive: 5
Interior Design: 5
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 5
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 5
Performance Rating: 5
Interior Rating: 5
Reliability Rating: 5
I bought this vehicle as a replacemnt
to a 2000 grand caravan sport that was
a lemon. This vehicle though less fancy
has more power and runs flawlessly.
Althought the interior compared to most
is sparse, all u need is there
competent heat and AC and a very good
compact disc player. I also opted for
the child seats which my 4 year old
loves.I bought this car with 29000
miles and it runs new!!!!
MY VOYAGER
PAPA on 11/25/2003
Performance: 3
Comfort: 5
Fuel Economy: 3
Fun To Drive: 5
Interior Design: 5
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 5
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 5
Performance Rating: 3
Interior Rating: 5
Reliability Rating: 5
I HAD NO PROBLEMS IN ALMOST 8000 MLS.
WIFE LOVES IT SO DO I AND GRANDKIDS.I
AVERAGE 24 MPG ITS THE BEST NEW VEHICLE
I HAVE OWNED. BETTER THAN THE TOYOTAS I
OWNED BEFORE
Chrysler Hates Tall People!
NOvan4me on 11/13/2003
Performance: 1
Comfort: 2
Fuel Economy: 1
Fun To Drive: 1
Interior Design: 4
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 5
Reliability: 4
Comfort Rating: 2
Performance Rating: 1
Interior Rating: 4
Reliability Rating: 4
My wife has a pt cruiser and I drive
the Van. Chrysler HATES tall people.
And they especially hate tall
overweight people. I have problems
getting comfortable, hard to get in
and out of. No where for my knees
etc. If you do get this dog, GET a 6
cylinder, not 4 banger! No power!
Transmission pops, clanks and scares
me.
Great Van, Great Value
avusblue on 07/06/2003
Performance: 5
Comfort: 5
Fuel Economy: 4
Fun To Drive: 4
Interior Design: 5
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 5
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 5
Performance Rating: 5
Interior Rating: 5
Reliability Rating: 5
We had a 1993 Voyager that was totally
troublefree for 10 years. The new one
is vastly improved in the areas of
quietness, smooth ride, good power,
and ease of access. Very comfortable
highway cruiser and city commuter.
Perfect compact size -- yet ample space
inside.
Overall, a great balance -- very
comfortable, easy to live with,
enjoyable to drive. Get past
the "minivan image" and just enjoy what
a great vehicle these are.
Paid a shade under $20K for a fully
equipped 3.3 "Popular Package" LX with
ABS and CD/cassette as the only options.
Satisfied New Owner!
cakakic on 07/06/2003
Performance: 4
Comfort: 4
Fuel Economy: 4
Fun To Drive: 4
Interior Design: 4
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 4
Reliability: 4
Comfort Rating: 4
Performance Rating: 4
Interior Rating: 4
Reliability Rating: 4
Smooth ride on the freeway, very
minimal wind and road-seam noise. The
frame absorbs most of the 'bang' and
potholes from city driving (here in
Tulsa we have some of the worst
roads). Acceleration can seem a bit
slugish at certain ranges but always
has sufficient power to get you up to
traffic flow in minimal time. Corners
very well.
3rdVan
FiveDoor on 04/11/2003
Performance: 4
Comfort: 5
Fuel Economy: 3
Fun To Drive: 4
Interior Design: 4
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 3
Reliability: 4
Comfort Rating: 5
Performance Rating: 4
Interior Rating: 4
Reliability Rating: 4
After five months we have had only one
problem that remains unresolved. A
sometimes noticeable slackness
somewhere in the drivetrain which does
not seem to effect driveability has not
been found. Otherwise enjoy the van.
Build quality does not seem quite as
good as our 2000 was. Our two previous
vans were both made in Canada. This one
was built in the U.S.
Missing Important things
msdania on 02/05/2003
Performance: 5
Comfort: 5
Fuel Economy: 5
Fun To Drive: 4
Interior Design: 2
Exterior Design: 5
Build Quality: 5
Reliability: 5
Comfort Rating: 5
Performance Rating: 5
Interior Rating: 2
Reliability Rating: 5
I bought this car thinking that Chyrsler
was a top rated vehicle. While I'm
pleased with the overall car I found
some things I don't like.
First: I didn't buy the baseline but
this 2003 does not have remote mirrors.
What gives?
Second: I have two bench seats. I can
move the larger to the front, but the
small one can't go into the back. Poor
design!
There were other things that were more
my fault for not looking at better,
but......ummm. Not a happy camper.